I think the online submission system is very similar to other journals, so I thought someone might help me to understad this. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. did you end up hearing back? Papers that are published independently while your manuscript is under review or under revision at Nature Communications are also not considered to compromise novelty, even in cases where there is conceptual overlap. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' Very interesting question Can anybody add a point of two about the style of Nature communications manuscript review process: 1. 3. I think the online submission system is very similar to other journals, so I thought someone might help me to understad this. By using a secured online solution, it is possible to Functionality faster than before. "under editorial consideration" editor. Science. The journal has confirmed that you've uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant . [] manuscript under consideration. Probably no answer to thisbut posting this will make me feel a little better? But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days.I wonder if this is a usual case. The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. As the complexity and interdisciplinary nature of science evolve, so do the networks of collaborations both within and between labs. Here "Under consideration" means that your paper has passed the initial check and now it is assigned to an Associate Editor. the second sentence means that you have passed this initial check and that your ms has (or will be) sent to the reviewers. under consideration means the journal has received your manuscript, under editorial consideration means that your manuscript has been assigned to an editor. Glitches in the system at the journals end could be another possibility. The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have . Or it just means that an editor is evaluating it? Dong, C.#, Zheng, Y.#, Long-Iyer, K., Wright, E. C., Li, Y. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Each new submission is assigned to a primary editor, who reads the paper, consults with the other editors, and then evaluates the novelty and potential impact of the work, the appropriateness for the journal's editorial scope, the conceptual or methodological advances described in the paper, and its potential interest toNature Communications' readership. We believe that preprint servers and journals serve their authors and readers most effectively when they work together. What does awaiting decision mean for college application? var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); We support our reviewers signing their reports to authors if reviewers feel comfortable doing so. If anything, that notification is a signal to Production of e.g. The following resource provides insights into manuscript status tracking:Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. (Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received). For manuscript preparation please use the attached Word template. Following. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration. We had the same issue with an article in Science Translational Medicine. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. The effective toolkit enables you to type text on the document, insert and modify images, annotate, and so forth. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Using longitudinal data, the current study examined the relation between mental health and unemployment. *, & Tian, L.* (2022).Fluorescence imaging of neural activity, neurochemical dynamics, and drug-specific . Decisions can be reversed on appeal only if the authors provide convincing evidence that the original decision was based on a factual error or was taken as a result of biased reviewers comments. These authors ask for the referees' advice to be disregarded, and often suggest the names of "real experts" in the field. . In 2021, I joined Li lab and started my journey on understanding the dynamics of the neuropeptides in the brain by employing genetically-encoded sensors. on 14 Jun, 2022. Put on sad music. . st james hospital covid test price hotel with private pool in room los angeles . under consideration. [CDATA[> [CDATA[> Under Review - Issue is being examined. Nature Research encourage preprint deposition of the originally submitted version of manuscripts. The combined instruction group correlations may be misleading because of the nature of the different instructions while the four individual correlations were performed on groups with only an N of 20 which is rather low to show reliable findings. . Can you kindly publish your timelines? Manuscript under editorial consideration in Nature Reviews Neuroscience Abstract Converging evidence suggests that each parahippocampalhippocampal sub-region contributes uniquely to the encoding, consolidation and retrieval of declarative memories, yet their precise roles remain elusive. [CDATA[// >